May 20, 2013

Even though it was broken when we passed it…

Senate Democrats block the repeal of  ‘Obamacare’ and continue their headlong dash to self-induced defeat in 2012…

February 04, 2011

by Matt Campbell

 This past Wednesday, Senate Democrats once again failed to listen to the will of the vast majority of American citizens, by opposing Republican efforts to put forward a repeal of the healthcare law ratified in 2010. The repeal measure, which was passed last week by the United States House of Representatives, was blunted in the Senate by a vote straight down party lines. 51 Democrats, 47 Republicans.

More distressing than the vote is the continuing willful disregard of Senate Democrats to acknowledge or even consider the will of those whom they represent. Further, the Senate Democrats refused to recognize that the healthcare bill that they passed into law should have never been passed. This stubborn attitude was demonstrated in the comments several Senate Democrats made from the floor. Perhaps the most telling of these comments were those made by Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida:

“My preference is we fix the law, that we don’t throw it out” said Nelson from the Senate floor Wednesday.

The word “fix” by its definition implies a state of brokenness, and if the bill was broken, why was it passed at the intial vote in March of last year? Senate Democrats have yet to explain that discrepancy, but Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi may have given an clear insight into the Democrat thought processes with her enthusiastic declaration - ”We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it…”

Sen. Nelson, however, is not the only senatorial Democrat demonstrating a lack of connectivity to the will of the American citizenry.  Senate majority leader Harry Reid, took a swing at Senate Republicans saying - ”They are fighting for repeal but refusing to offer any new ideas… Republicans have had a year to propose a plan to replace the law they dislike even though 80% of Americans don’t want it repealed in the first place.”   The problem with Sen. Reid’s “80%” number is that it is just plain wrong. According to Rasmussen,  58% of Americans want the healthcare law REPEALED.  Also,  in the most recent Quinnipiac poll the numbers favor repeal as well with 48% favoring repeal to 43% falling in the “don’t repeal”, or “don’t know” category. Furthermore, Republicans were, in fact, offering a solution… Don’t pass a broken bill – especially when it goes against the will of the American people.

In all likelihood, this matter will end up before the Supreme Court, and many Democrat Senators, including Sen. Bill Nelson, seem ready to pass along the responsibility for this decision.

Sen. Nelson made this clear in his statements from the floor:  ”Doesn’t anyone conclude that this matter is going to the Supreme Court to decide if this law is constitutional or not? The Supreme Court decision is going to discard political and partisan interests.” Nelson continued “Why don’t we just expedite the matter?”

Both Republican and Democrat Senators received thousands of letters and e-mails requesting the repeal of the 2010 healthcare law. For Sen. Nelson messages from his home state of Florida included communications from two of his likely competitors in the 2012 Senate race for the seat he now holds.

Florida State Senate President Mike Haridopolos and U.S. Representative Connie Mack (R- 14) both sent letters to Sen. Bill Nelson requesting that he support the repeal. Representative Connie Mack wrote eloquently, but stated in no uncertain terms precisely what Florida constituents expected of Sen. Nelson - ”It is critically important that you listen to the will of your constituents and to the federal courts that ruled it unconstitutional, and finally stop supporting this dreadful, unconstitutional, and harmful piece of legislation… Floridians await your decision,” Rep. Mack wrote “and also know to be mindful of any procedural motions ahead of the vote that would also measure your intentions.”    Sen. Nelson will face both Haridopolos and Mack in the swiftly approaching campaign season, where it is likely the health care law will play a significant role.

By the admission of Republicans, the vote for repealing  ’Obamacare’  was a long shot in the Democrat-controlled Senate, but Republican leaders were quick to point out that this vote is just the start.  Republican Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell stated- “This fight isn’t over. We intend to continue the fight to repeal and replace ‘Obamacare’.

Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina made reference to the far-reaching effects of this Senate vote in his statement- “There is going to be a presidential election in 2012, and this healthcare bill is going to be an issue…”

Many ongoing court battles will keep this law in the forefront, including Florida’s recent court decision, finding the 2010 healthcare law unconstitutional.

All of America will be keeping watch; both on the course of this bill, and the Democrat Senators who continue to ignore the will of the people in favor of party agenda.

POWER GRAB IN DC, SOME DID NOT LISTEN 11/4/10

Senator Harry Reid has begun playing political games with our government, just prior to the 112th Congress taking office. Senator Reid wants to change the Senate rules on the Filibuster from a two thirds majority to a simple majority of 51 votes. Apparently Senator Reid just has a message problem (which seems to be the case in DC these days). After the money he spent and the hard campaigning he had to do to retain his seat in the senate you would think even his shadow understood the message from the Nov. election.

Where is the outrage from the other Senators? I haven’t heard very much from them about this and I subscribe to newsletters from several Senators! The citizens need to send a clear message that we expect our Senators to stand up for the rules as they exist now. Contact your Senator and let them know where you stand and where you expect them to stand on this issue. The danger of this rule change is that it eliminates the checks and balances that stand in the Senate. The filibuster is to stop the majority party from shutting out the minority party and both parties need this check to remain.

Mitch McConnell was quoted in The Washington Post on Jan. 5, 2011 saying:
“What every Republican senator, and many Democratic senators, realized at the time was that any attempt by a sitting majority to grasp at power would come back to haunt us. Even worse, any rule change aimed at making it easier for one party to force legislation through the Senate with only a slim partisan majority would undermine the Senate’s unique role as a moderating influence and put a permanent end to bipartisanship.”

John Thune was quoted in the US News stating:
“It would forever change the nature of the Senate and constitute a naked partisan power grab. Such a move would disrespect our bipartisan system and the will of the American people.”

A post on the CBS Political Hotsheet states that some Democrats are fearful of a weakened filibuster and are skeptical of the rule change.

Are the citizens of the country going to stand for this I ask? I believe the election on Nov. 4, 2010 answered that question pretty clearly. The citizenry of this country are fed up with tactics such as this and are now engaged. Millions of citizens are doing their civic duty to help steer their representatives in the direction they were elected to take this country. Lets hope Senator Reid and his staff are listening.

In closing I would like to wish all of those hurt in the Arizona shooting a fast and speedy recovery and to the families of those who lost someone my deepest sympathies. We need only to blame the shooter, those close to him who knew him and those in the community who also knew he was a loose cannon and did nothing. It is time we as a country look out for the safety of each other.

Reid Pulls Controversial $1.2 Trillion Spending Bill in Favor of Short-Term Budget Fix

December 16, 2010 

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, bowing to Republican opposition to a 1,924-page $1.2 trillion spending measure packed with earmarks, withdrew the bill and said he would work with Republican leaders on a smaller, short-term budget fix to avoid a looming government shutdown. 

The government already is operating on a temporary stopgap measure, set to expire at the end of Friday. Republicans had insisted on having the massive spending bill read aloud – a move that would have delayed a final vote until next week. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has offered a one-page stopgap bill that would fund the government for just the next two months. Reid said he would with McConnell to finalize such a measure. 

Reid, in announcing his decision, lashed out, saying that he had the support of the nine GOP senators needed to pass the measure, but suddenly that support evaporated. 

“This action taken by my friends on other side of aisle going to cause people to lose their job,” Reid said. 

McConnell gave a different interpretation. 

“He doesn’t have the votes,” McConnell said. “And the reason he doesn’t have the votes is because members on this side of the aisle increasingly felt concerned about the way we do business.” 

A McConnell aide said the leader “worked the phones” for days, pressing his members to quash the bill. Republicans had strongly condemned the $1.27 trillion omnibus spending bill, which would fund the government through Sept. 30, for its $8.3 billion worth of earmarks — though some of those earmarks belong to Republicans. 

Defenders of earmarks point out that the money for congressional earmarks represents a tiny portion of the bill — less than 1 percent — and that lawmakers know the needs of their states and congressional districts better than administration bureaucrats. And just because something is in the president’s budget doesn’t mean that it’s not pork. 

“If you look up earmark in the dictionary, it means ‘to designate or set aside.’ It is not ‘in addition to,’” said Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah. “If the Congress does not exercise its constitutional authority to designate where the funds will go, the administration will usurp that authority and you will get every bit as much pork barrel spending.” 

Such arguments, however, have been drowned out by protests from Tea Party activists and other opponents of the projects, who make fun of earmarks like $100,000 obtained by Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., to renovate the Edgar Allan Poe museum in the Bronx, a cottage where the poet lived for the final three years of his life. 

Other senators with earmarks in the bill after voting last month to ban them include Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.; Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.; Richard Burr, R-N.C.; Kay Baily Hutchison, R-Texas; Bill Nelson, D-Fla.; and Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. 

Even avid earmarker Thad Cochran of Mississippi, the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee — who obtained almost 300 earmarks totaling more than $500 million — hasn’t explicitly come out in support of the bill, though he’s widely expected to vote with Democrats later this week to advance it. 

So is Ohio Republican George Voinovich, who’s responsible, along with Democratic homestate colleague Sherrod Brown, for 77 earmarks totaling $94 million. 

Fox News’ Trish Turner and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Original Article

Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com