May 19, 2013

What the results of the Florida GOP Primary mean (really)…

Mitt Romney won the state of Florida’s GOP Primary, and we congratulate him – To paraphrase Dr. Ray Stantz in Ghostbusters 2 – “Mr. Romney, you’ll be happy to know that almost 33% of our staff voted for you in the Primary…”

That being said, as the staff sat around the conference table on Wednesday, we asked each other what the GOP Primary showed us both good and bad – here’s what we came up with…

First, we learned that Romney is not a pushover when he is behind the 8 ball. Coming off of a pretty crummy showing in South Carolina, Romney was determined to make a good showing in Florida and did so. He exercised good strategy in spending a massive amount of money in the more populous areas for advertising. Outspending Gingrich by 5 to 1*, Romney blanketed the airwaves, and his numbers in these areas showed the results.

Second, we learned that Romney can get Florida Republican voters. Well, half of them at least – in the areas where there is a large portion of Republicans of a more moderate demeanor. This worked well for Romney in the Primary, where only Republicans were able to vote. Florida (particularly SOUTH Florida) has had a tremendous upsurge in voters who have switched their party from Republican to Independent. Like much of the country, this switch in Party affiliation is not to demonstrate ‘Centrism’ but instead to voice a lack of confidence in the Republican Party’s Conservativism. While this bodes well for a Republican candidate in the General election, Gingrich and Santorum were much more heavily favored in his group. It should also be noted that despite an increase in membership numbers, the Republican Party is now the 3rd Party in Broward County from a membership perspective.  The independents are often members of conservative grassroots organizations such as 9/12 and the Tea Party and their focus is constitutional Conservativism, which is by all indications is to the right of where the bulk of Romney’s platform sits.

Also, we learned that Romney can perform well in a debate. Romney took Gingrich to task during the Florida Debate about the negative ads that Newt’s campaign had run. Instead of taking the most expeditious and genteel route, an immediate apology, Gingrich responded with further attack, giving Romney greater latitude. Furthermore, Romney was able to justify the significant attack ad spend as a response to Gingrich’s truculent attitude in the debate. It was a well-played debate by Romney, and may have cost Gingrich all 50 of the Florida Delegates (at least at the time of this writing). Gingrich is normally very strong in a debate, but had an off night, and came under serious attack. We will state for the record that BOTH Romney and Gingrich are entirely too thin skinned in the debates. All of the candidates are politically experienced, and should be beyond this kind of rattling

Finally, we learned that Romney is good on the economy, but will run into difficulties with the Government-provided healthcare issue. Senator Rick Santorum pointed this out in the debate, and it is likely that no matter how many times Romney says he will make the repeal of Obamacare his primary mission; all it will take is Obama demonstrating the similarities between the Massachusetts plan and the Federal Plan to effectively hamstring Romney’s arguments. Romney needs to strengthen his case on this issue.

The primary also showed us that Gingrich can rally Tea Party support, but that he needs a more effective ground team in each of the states. We also learned that establishment Republicans are worried about having Gingrich as the Republican nominee. It can be inferred that this concern is due to his knowledge of the way things work in DC. Bottom line, they won’t be able to pull one over on Gingrich. Gingrich has need of a good, trustworthy, consistent ground team – and it is not too late to have one. If he gets that in the next few weeks then FL becomes a hiccup, rather than an ulcer.

Additionally we learned that Santorum can give a good accounting of himself when he is given the chance, but that unless he is able to canvass the state, his election performance will be curtailed.  Santorum has strong convictions, and is, by all acounts, a very ‘nice guy’.  Some of the moderate elements of the Republican ‘Big Tent’ have differences of opinion with his personal beliefs, but outside of Florida that group will not be as significant. 

The Florida GOP Primary was tough for many of our staff to watch, because every one of the candidates has one or two (or several) supporters on our team. All of the candidates have strengths and despite our internal preferences, we are all committed to supporting the eventual nominee when the National GOP Primary process has been completed. Each of us has our own “favorite” candidate, but we recognize that this election is too important to let our 20% differences derail efforts to turn this country from the dangerous path it is on.

Hopefully all Republicans, both Moderate and Conservative will be able to accomplish that same unification when the dust from the GOP Primary has settled!

Keep Watch! 

*There is a rumor going around that Romney spent 65 to 1 against Gingrich - all our research shows this to be very skewed mathematics.

Gingrich is ‘GO’ for launch to victory in Cocoa Beach

Cocoa Beach, Fl – After speaking to a massive crowd earlier today in Coral Spring at a restaurant that serves wings, Newt Gingrich gave the dreams of Space Coast constituents wings with his speech in the early evening hours. 

Taking a break from his standard stump speech, Gingrich talked about bold, imaginative plans that fired the imaginations of a segment of Floridians that have been cast aside by the decisions of the Obama Administration.  Obama’s decision to moth ball NASA has left the once active and tourist-friendly Cocoa Beach area reeling under the weight of a stagnate economy.  Gingrich’s speech described a vision that lit fires in the eyes of more than a few  of the more than 600 attendees.

“I am sick of being told we have to be timid and I’m sick of being told we have to be limited to technologies that are 50 years old, Gingrich said.

Gingrich spoke of resurrecting the space program through privitization and competition, making the goal of a return (and yes, colonization) to the moon a prime goal.  The former Speaker of the House also spoke of making Mars one of the missions, calling to mind memories of  John F. Kennedy’s challenge to Americans on our reach to the moon.

Though his ideas have been called “grandiose” (a designation he does not dispute), there can be no doubt that Gingrich HAS ideas.  The question that his competitors and Democrats must be asking themselves is “Can he back those ideas up with action?”.  If history is any indicator, the answer is “yes”.

The claims that Gingrich makes regarding working with Reagan and other politicians to cut spending are matters of historical fact.  It is also a matter of history that he worked to pass the Balanced Budget Amendment of 1997 – leading to 4 consecutive years of a balanced budget.  It can be argued that the former Speaker of the House is aggressive in getting things done, sometimes with conflict, but he does get them done. 

So when he is quoted in Cocoa Beach, FL saying  ..” By the end of my second term, we will have the first permanent base on the moon and it will be American”, it may be that astrophysicists and engineers start dusting off their résumés, while GOP competitors and Democrats start listening for the sonic boom of a rocket launching.  If the positive reaction of the crowd on the Space Coast was any indicator, Gingrich’s Republican nomination is a ‘GO’ for launch and victory.

Keep Watch!

 

Gingrich stands for ‘American Exceptionalism’ in Coral Springs VIDEO

Coral Springs, FL – Speaking to a crowd of more than 1200 South Floridians, Newt Gingrich inspired belief in a return to greatness for the United States –“I stand for American Exceptionalism, not because you and I are exceptional -  we’re normal- but because the system we have inherited from the Founding Fathers is the most exceptional system in history.”

Here’s the video:

video courtesy of EyesOnPolitics on YouTube

The event held at the popular political hotspot, Wings Plus in Coral Springs, drew attendees from all over South Florida, to hear the man whom many in attendance believe will be the next President of the United States.  Their expectations were well met.

Despite a delay in arrival, the Former Speaker arrived to a massive crowd of enthusiastic voters and participants cheering and applauding.  After a brief introduction by grassroots leader Karin Hoffman, Newt Gingrich started by challenging Obama’s State of the Union address.  “..When he [Obama] proposed a 30% minimum tax, if he actually means it…the President last night proposed doubling the tax on capital gains which is THE engine which drives job creation in the United States, so he’s talking about killing job creation in America, something he’s been really good at doing for 3 years, and now wants to continue .”

It was at this point that Gingrich was interrupted by the one heckler, yes just one, (identified and a likely plant <appreciation to Red Broward >) in the crowd of well over 1000 people.  Sadly this interruption has become the focus of much of the ‘gotcha’ media.

Gingrich responded to the lone heckler with facts and humor, and continued focusing on the issues facing our nation “We’re not going to let her disrupt us from having a rational conversation”  He continued “I believe that to defeat Obama we need someone who is a conservative and who can stand up to him in a debate, and who can clearly draw the contrast  – between the Declaration of Independence and the writings of Saul Alinsky, between the Constitution and European Socialism, between citizens and subjects, and between job creation and food stamps”

The GOP candidate is backing up his words with an expectation of victory and challenge“… in my acceptance speech [of the Republican Nomination] I will challenge the president to 7 three-hour debates”.  He outlined that the debates should be staffed with a timekeeper but no moderator, and he expects the Obama to accept the challenge.

Gingrich also outlined the three major points he believes are distinctions between his campaign and that of the Obama Administration – Economics, Values, and National Security

See the video here

Economics – Gingrich spoke about working with Reagan, spending cuts, and in 1997 the balanced budget amendment he passed – resulting in 11million jobs and $405 billion in national debt paid off

Values – Gingrich stressed the differences between American Exceptionalism of individual soveriegnty and the European Model where Government is soverign and people are subjects. “Obama is confused about what country he’s in” Gingrich said

National Security – The former Speaker stated that “…the lesson of History is that when dictators  tell you horrible things, they probably mean it… what’s the answer to that?  The answer is an America so consistently strong, that no one would be foolish enough to take us on.” See the video below:

video courtesy of EyesOnPolitics on YouTube

Gingrich outlined these clear distinctions between what he believes, and what the Obama Administration has enacted.   He appealed to the voters in attendance, and made it clear that this Primary and general election is not just about voting.  Gingrich wants to reach all Americans, and stand side by side with them in the business of getting the country back on track. “I’m running to be the republican nominee, but I want you to understand that during the General Election I want to run an American Campaign… I did not come here today to ask you to be for me… I came here to ask you to be WITH me… it’s a big difference-  No one person, even the president, can get America back on the right track… but if you’re willing to be with us…side by side…Together, we are going to start getting America back in the right direction…”

Newt’s speech was inspiring, had strength, and was exactly what the attendees were hoping for – a clear direction for the country, and a candidate capable of leading in that direction.  One male attendee said that the Speaker had made up his mind by saying “I was really impressed with what Newt said today… I think he can unite America around itself, because we are the right country and the right people, we just have needed the right plan and the right leader.  Newt’s it…”

The Republican Primary is on Tuesday January 31st, 2012.

Congress Overturns Military Ban of Gays Serving Openly, Sends Bill to Obama's Desk

December 18, 2010 

WASHINGTON – In a landmark vote, the Senate on Saturday ended the Clinton-era ban on gays serving openly in the military, marking a major triumph for President Obama, liberals and the gay community. 

The final vote to end the Pentagon’s 1993 “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy was 65-31, drawing support from eight Republicans. 

The bill now goes to the White House for Obama’s signature. He is expected to sign the bill into law next week, a senior White House aide told Fox News. 

“It is time to close this chapter in our history,” Obama said in a statement after a test vote cleared the way for final action. “It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed.” 

Once the law is repealed, gays will be openly accepted by the military for the first time in U.S. history, and can acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out. More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

After two failed attempts this year to repeal the policy, the third time proved to be the charm for Congress. The bill passed the House this week in a 250-175 vote, and cleared a final Senate hurdle earlier Saturday in a 63-33 vote, clearing the way for final passage. 

The eight Republicans who joined Democrats in passing the repeal were: Sens. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mark Kirk of Illinois, George Voinovich of Ohio, Richard Burr of North Carolina, John Ensign of Nevada and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine. 

Voinovich said in a statement that he had vowed to keep an open mind until the release earlier this month of the Pentagon’s report on the impact of overturning the ban. 

“Having reviewed the report, I accept its findings and Secertary Gates’ recommendation and reassurance that the repeal will be implemented when the battle effectiveness of our forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed,” he said. 

Supporters of repealing the ban applauded the repeal. 

“Today’s vote is the critical strike against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ and toward creating a path that could end in lesbian, gay and bisexual people being able to serve openly, honestly, and to great benefit of our country,” said Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. “We celebrate this important victory and thank all the senators who supported fairness today. We are on the brink of making history.” 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the vote “closes the door on a fundamental unfairness in our nation.” 

“When President Obama signs this bill into law, we will begin opening the doors of our armed forces to all patriotic Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation,” she said. 

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he welcomed repeal of the policy and added that the Pentagon “will immediately proceed with the planning necessary to carry out this change carefully and methodically, but purposefully.” 

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he was pleased to see Congress repeal the policy. 

“More critically, it is the right thing to do,” he said. “No longer will able men and women who want to serve and sacrifice for their country have to sacrifice their integrity to do so. We will be a better military as a result.” 

Secretary Hillary Clinton, who was first lady when “don’t ask, don’t tell” was first enacted, issued a statement cheering its repeal. 

“This is historic step forward for all Americans, a step toward a more perfect union and a more perfect reflection of our core values,” she said. “As the president and I have repeatedly said, we are committed to universal standards abroad and here at home. Our progress on equality here strengthens our advocacy for human dignity everywhere.” 

The passage delivers a resounding victory to Obama, who made repeal of the 17-year-old law a campaign promise in 2008. 

It also is a win for congressional Democrats who have struggled in the final hours of the lame-duck session to overcome Republican objections, and for gay rights groups who said Saturday’s vote was their best shot at changing the law because a new GOP-dominated Congress will take control in January. 

Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers — the defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — are required to certify to Congress that lifting the ban won’t hurt troops’ ability to fight. After that, 60 days must pass before any changes go into effect 

A small but vocal group of Republicans led by Sen. John McCain of Arizona said the law shouldn’t be changed during wartime. 

“We send these young people into combat,” said McCain. “We think they’re mature enough to fight and die. I think they’re mature enough to make a judgment on who they want to serve with and the impact on their battle effectiveness.” 

But the Democratic push for repeal was strengthened by the release of a major Pentagon study that concluded gays could serve openly without affecting combat effectiveness. The assessment found that two-thirds of troops predicted little impact if the law is repealed.

Original Article from Fox News, the Associated Press contributed.

Senate Republicans Reject Obama's Plan to Extend Tax Cuts for Middle Class Only

Senate Republicans on Saturday voted against President Obama’s plan to extend the Bush tax cuts to only the middle class in a pair of votes Democrats are seizing to paint the GOP as guardians of the rich. The Senate voted 53-36 to extend all expiring tax cuts on individuals with incomes of less than $200,000 a year and married couples making less than $250,000 — seven shy of the required 60 to advance. The other proposal, which drew opposition from White House officials, would have renewed them for all tax filers with incomes of $1 million or less. That also failed in a 53-36 vote.

President Obama said he was “very disappointed” in the Senate’s verdict. “Those provisions should have passed,” he said.”It makes no sense to to hold tax cuts for the middle class hostage to permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans especially when those high-income tax cuts would cost an additional $700 billion that we don’t have and would add to our deficit.” “But with so much at stake, today’s votes cannot be the end of the discussion,” he said. “It’s absolutely essential to hardworking middle class families and to the economy to make sure their taxes don’t go up on Jan. 1.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell immediately slammed the political maneuvering by Democrats after the votes. “According to the strange the logic of Democratic leaders in Congress, the best way to show middle class Americans that they care about creating jobs is to slam some of America’s top job creators with a massive tax hike,” he said on the Senate floor. “Today’s vote was an affront to the millions of Americans who are struggling to find work and a clear signal that Democrats in Congress still haven’t got the message from the November elections,” he said. The Senate vote is expected to clear the way for negotiations between the White House and Republicans to resume on a bill to extend the tax cuts at all levels. Any agreement is also expected to renew expiring jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed.

Also part of the discussions is a possible increase in the federal debt limit, which allows the government to continue to borrow to meet its financial obligations. But Democrats, already eyeing the 2012 elections, wanted to use this showdown to weaken a resurgent GOP. “All those people out there in the Tea Party that are angry about the economics of Washington, they really need to look at this,” Sen. Claire McCaskill., D-Mo., said Friday as Democrats took turns pummeling Republicans. “They need to pull back the curtain and realize that you’ve got a Republican Party that’s not worried about the people in the Tea Party,” said McCaskill, who will be on the ballot next year. “They’re worried about people that can’t decide which home to go to over the Christmas holidays.”

In the weekly White House radio and Internet address, Vice President Biden, skipped lightly over Obama’s willingness to negotiate with the GOP on the Bush-era tax breaks. “We’ve got to extend the tax cuts for the middle class that are set to expire at the end of the month,” he said. “If we don’t, millions of middle-class families will see a big bite out of their paychecks starting January 1. And that’s the last thing we should let happen.” “And the second thing we’ve got to do is extend unemployment insurance for Americans who have lost their jobs in a tough economy,” Biden said. Delivering the Republican address, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, who was sworn into office this week, said voters in the midterm elections demonstrated their distaste for any tax increases. “The current leaders of Congress should not move forward with plans that were just rejected by the American people,” he said. “These leaders should not raise taxes and risk another recession. Instead, Congress should reduce spending and prevent another tax hike on American taxpayers.”

 - The Associated Press

White House seeks to sell nuclear treaty by noting support in Eastern Europe

By Associated Press

22 Nov  2010

 WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House says support from NATO allies and governments in Eastern Europe for a nuclear treaty with Russia is an important endorsement of a pact that faces Republican opposition in the Senate.

 White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden continue to talk to senators to win approval of the treaty before Congress adjourns this year.

 The treaty would reduce U.S. and Russian strategic warhead arsenals and renew inspections.

 The White House emphasis on support from Eastern European governments addresses worries raised by at least one Republican. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, has said he had concerns that the treaty would “undermine the confidence” of allies in Central and Eastern Europe.

Obama's Leftward Lurch Erodes His Control of Congress

08 Jul 2010 

By Dick Morris 

Barack Obama faces about the same problem that confronted Bill Clinton in 1994 when he lost control of Congress. In both cases, the Democratic presidents had alienated moderate and conservative voters and found themselves increasingly isolated with a political base of liberals and minorities. 

In each instance, the president worried that off-year election turnout among their base would be attenuated both because it always is in non-presidential years and because their policy failings had reduced the enthusiasm they found among their base voters. And both men found themselves forced to escalate their rhetoric and move their ideological positions to the left in order to try to drum up the kind of turnout they needed to keep power in Congress. 

Clinton failed, and Obama will too. 

When President Clinton asked me to help him to move to the center to win re-election in 1996, he said, “I’ve moved so far to the left that I don’t even recognize myself.” 

At heart a moderate, while Obama is, at core, a leftist, Clinton was alluding to the positions he had to take to keep the support of his liberal House majority. Obama — for whom the further left he drifts the better — has no such qualms but the political impact of his move to the left will be just as fatal for his congressional majority as it was for Clintons’. 

When a president moves leftward, a vicious cycle begins to set in. 

Driven to raise the intensity of his rhetoric and to take positions further to the extreme, he alienates more and more centrists and moderates, forcing himself to rely more and more on left-wing voters. 

This reliance, in turn, fuels an ever more pronounced leftward drift until he ends up with a vastly diminished political base. 

In Obama’s case, his reliance on minority voters adds to the difficulty as he drives racially fair whites to see him as governing primarily in the interests of minority voters. 

Obama’s decision to have his Justice Department sue Arizona over its immigration law, despite the fact that American voters back the statute by 2-to-1, is the latest illustration of that leftward drift. So is Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision not to prosecute the Black Panthers who posted themselves at a mixed-race polling place in military uniforms with clubs. 

The further Obama moves to the left, the more he has to move to the left. And the worse it is for his ability to control Congress. 

Original Article

Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com